Mini Miranda Warning - Is anybody aware of this
Thu, 11/03/2005 08:25
Vikas had posted the above in another thread, and so that I'm not hijacking from that thread I wanted to start a fresh one to ask a specific question.
About the above -- I read on a site run by an attorney that in 1996 an amendment was made to fdcpa which requires the "mini-Miranda warning" to be included only in the initial communication. Subsequent communications must only cite that the communication is from a debt collector.
Has anyone else seen anything similar to the above? Not trying to nitpick the point, but as I'm trying to learn quickly I'd like to know which is actually current/correct.